Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Can i ask you where you get that expression?

Because "heal" means to heal. If the githyanki can remove the parasite, then it technically counts as healing, and to me, that's what Tav thinks when the question is answered. Thus, it surprises me when Laezel disapproves.

I intellectually understand that Shadowheart doesn't mean the githyanki when she talks about finding a "healer," but that's only an understanding I developed after playing the game.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
3 problems:

Let me clarify, then.

A. I see nothing wrong with a player buying into what Laezel is saying.

B. I see nothing wrong with a player not buying into what Laezel is saying.

C. I don't believe there is any one gospel truth as to what a player should think about what Laezel is saying.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Even if that would be right, it would only mean that argument that happens here dont include them. smile

What it means is that we're not talking about a systemic problem.


Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Even if ... that that alone is huge if, bcs im not aware of this situation and wont lie to you ... i dont believe he did ...

Tav 100% says outright that Halsin is the best option. This is a fact, not a debate.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Again ... it dont. :P

Yes, it does.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
True!

Agreed.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Again, true ... even tho it seemed easier in Patch 7 ...

Either that, ot Barbarian was closer to my heart than Bard ...
Wich is hardly surprising, even cow turd is closer to my heart than Bards. :-/

Yeah, I tend to think the barbarian is a lot more effective than the bard. Most combats, in my opinion, feel easier with the barbarian.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
But its true that this fight is really hard, and if RNG screws you, you REALLY feels it here. :-/

Shrug. I agree. The fight is hard. The dice sometimes go against you. I also enjoy the fight.

Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Thats hardly an argument ...

Sure it is. If the fight is too hard for you, lower the difficulty.

As for the difficulty of the fight: it's winnable. In fact, I've never lost the fight. I'm not saying it's not hard, and I'm not saying that I might not lose the fight one day. Actually, even though I've never lost the fight, it's almost always very close.

I don't use exploits. I don't take barrels into the fight. I don't jump around invisible with the hammer that does damage when you jump. I don't even start by hiding my companions on top of the bridge.

But I do tend to use consumables in the fight. Potions, scrolls, etc.


Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
...artificaly incerased hitpoints...

This I have a real problem with.

I do not like it when the NPCs play by different rules. It is my strongly held opinion that NPCs should have the same rules for stats and hit points and abilities and everything. If the NPC needs to be stronger, raise the level by following the same rules.