Originally Posted by NinthPlane
Originally Posted by lamaros
Let's be real, BG3 is a far far far far far better game than Solasta.

Solasta does some stuff well that Larian can learn from, but only in select areas.

If better cinematics, a complex story, and player agency = better game then okay.

But, Larian is SO MUCH BIGGER than Owlcat and Tactical Adventures. So, I don't understand why we can't have as many subclasses as Pathfinder and a combat system as well done as Solasta along with the BG3 cinematics.

Because Pathfinder works with top down sprites low quality models with a good but not complete range of voice acting.. BG3 uses motion trackers for theyre 3 models's facial expressions and most animations. AND most of pathfinder subclasses only reuse mechanics from other classes for the most part. Bloodrager is a Barbarian/Sorcerer, Skald is a Barbarian/Bard ect. While DnD 5e bring in brand new mechanics that needs to be programmed in.