It gets old, fast. That's why I have flurries of activity around major updates, and then disappear. I understand the "but if I'm not harping on it every day they'll forget about me" thing, but given the way feedback is handled both in game and here, I don't see it as likely, and I sure don't see the need for a new thread every week about the same thing. "If it bothers you, don't reply" will come next, I'm sure, and I've read a lot more threads on these forums than I've replied to, and I have to wonder, would that axiom apply if I were to start a new thread every week insisting that the party size be kept to four, or would I get a lot of disparaging remarks about my character? I know where my money is going on any bets on that scenario, along with the added bonus of I won't be doing that anyway. Someone asked what would be the worst that happened, and I outlined a couple of things that have happened. I'm cool if ya'll are fine with reading the same spiel week in and week out, I'd prefer not to.
It'll be nice, once the game launches, to read about interesting things that happened in game instead of "but someone somewhere will be abusing this mechanic, and so it needs to be removed" or "but my party isn't big enough". The "trust in 5e" movement is going to be kind of funny soon too, when WotC releases 6e, because apparently, they don't trust it either? Yes, I know, that's a way for them to make more money on the IP, so they've got to release new stuff. It's just going to be funny to see "Trust in 5e" avatars once 6e hits the shelves.
