Originally Posted by lolwut77
I'm not a fan of characters changing their sexuality to suit the player. Also not a fan of being propositioned by the same sex without having encouraged the situation, so hopefully that's not a thing.
Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Originally Posted by mrfuji3
This is homophobic ...
It is ... but still its a valid opinion.

I dunno where you are from, but here in Czech i know many people who are allready tired how this new era of "forced tolerance" is suffocating everything ... in every single movie, series, story, game even comics ... you have to have at least one gay, one bi, one non-binary, one cultural and racial minority representatives ... everyone have to be presented, and there is often so many characters so you rarely see white heterosexual male that isnt bad guy of the story. laugh
It gets ridiculous and its understandable that some people have enough of that ... then it takes little for them to be upset by the same topic ...

And if i may add, most people who mind it *i* know are gay themselves ... so no homophobic exuse apply there. wink

Originally Posted by mrfuji3
IF BG3 is going to have companions proposition to you, then it should be irrespective of their sexuality.
Agreed 100% ...
Shame they dont have any in this game, huh?

While expressed poorly, I've said before that I'd have preferred to see a middle-ground of solutions. With everyone being into everyone, it gets so untied with reality that I wouldn't think even those wanting representation feels represented; Or becomes a mockery of it. I think it'd be good for the game and its players to have some companions heavily preferring men, others women, and some going both ways. That's more tied with reality and thus is more believable. If everyone's into everyone, no one matters, in a way. If Wyll was mostly into women, yet I was really into him, I'd appreciate having both a bromance path and a harder to achieve romance path where Wyll's appreciation changes because of me, not because everyone's into everyone because inclusion. I think you can be inclusive *and* be within a believable reality as well.

That being said, the thread is really skirting closure; I don't want to shut it down but social politics gets really spicy really fast, so tread carefully and be respectful to eachother.