Originally Posted by Drath Malorn
Originally Posted by Wormerine
I suppose it can work in coop play, as at least it is not I who can do the task, but I always approach RPGs a single player experience first.

I just want to draw the distinction between two concepts, that are certainly connected, yet very different. On the one hand, you have the number of adventurers : is it a Party of adventurers/companions, or a Solo adventurer ? On the other hand, you have the number of players : is is Single-Player or Multi-Player ?

I feel (perhaps wrongly, you tell me), that in the first part of your post you are saying that you're not fond of a Party-based RPG (with a party that can have multiple skills, instead of a Solo adventurer who would make do with what they themselves are good or bad at). Whereas in the second part you sort of say that you prefer Single-Player RPG.
Yes, sorry if I am being convoluted. I was attempting to state my personal preference for party RPGs with singular protagonist (PoE1&2, most of Bioware catalog), while at the same time trying to acknowledge benefits that BG3 could gain from doing things way OP suggests.