EDIT: The irony of presenting humble opinion as an objective truth is strong here. "Yes, it is." - How is that an opinion, yet "No, it isn't." is presented as objective truth? Take a moment to think on that.
Well spotted! It is indeed irony, but also it is a direct quote of Jandk, who more the most defends his right (and rightfully so) to have an opinion, yet posts stuff like "Yes, it is" (#Post824891) which I simply copied to my post.
If you read carefully, apply some good faith and read the whole paragraph, it is both implied by context, and clarified as an opinion. You're also conveniently avoiding the context of you claiming this to be him claiming this opinion to be objective truth. So don't play this fallacy/semantics game with me. I did warn you suspensions would follow if you did. See you in 7 days.
I believe it was Tuco whom promptly shared a video not too long ago, which I quite enjoyed - Enough to bookmark.
Originally Posted by Tuco
Originally Posted by Alexlotr
Still think that proper promts is the best solution for the reaction though, even if you know the damage number. Because it not only depends on the damage you're about to recieve but also on whether or not you're planning to use your reaction for something else this turn, not matter the damage (aoo for example). Presets just wouldn't give strong enough control.
Oh, no doubt about this. And people who love their toggles for automation so dearly could still use them all the way to the grave. So everyone is a winner.
