It's so factually NOT true. First because we had a bunch of walls of text that were all about defending Icelyn's right to be the forum's titular airhead and I was (deservingly?) the target of the criticsm, so the very premise of the claim you are agreeing with is bullshit.
Second, because she wasn't "criticized" (mostly by me) because of "positivity", to begin with, but for being scarily consistent across the years in her being in favor of ANY terrible idea a game designer may come up with. And consistently against anything that may add depth, immersion or a bit of challenge, too.
Man you really think you are a centre of the universe! I wasn't even thinking about you or any other user when I made this reply! I was agreeing with this part:
Originally Posted by snowram
Someone voicing a one line postive opinion leading to an entiere page of encyclopedic posts
...didn't even notice the second part, because the first was so true - it made me reply almost instantly! Sorry if I confused you!
Originally Posted by Tuco
Second, because she wasn't "criticized" (mostly by me) because of "positivity", to begin with, but for being scarily consistent across the years in her being in favor of ANY terrible idea a game designer may come up with.
You know those discussions where one flings a poop at the wall and one guy considers it a modern expressive art and the other says its just a piece of dung? And they both make this cry baby performance to prove something to each other? Except Icelyn didn't try to prove anything, so...
