I didn’t think she told you that until *after* you agree to help her, but could be wrong there. You could well be right that I simply wasn’t paying enough attention to exactly what she was asking me to do.
I admit ... you got me confused now if i didnt remember it wrong.
I was allready writing coment on being wrong myself in that case ... but then i said to myself "nah, better check" ... so here it is: 2:08.
Thanks for the vid, and fair enough. While she gives the detail about what she wants us to do after we agree to help, she does give more indication beforehand than I remembered. Personally, I still would prefer more certainty before saying I’d help her that I wasn’t locking myself into a course of action I couldn’t change, and don’t think the game should expect me to just select an option, particularly a major one like that, saying that I’ll do something without giving me the opportunity to indicate that I don’t mean to go through with it. But I can sympathise with a view that I’m being unreasonably risk averse here.
i should have said that "it dont matter to her" ...
I mean, she wants you to betray the Grove ...
> If you are honest ... you will help her.
> If you are dishonest ... she will attack the grove, just as she would if you werent there.
Basicaly there is no difference between her discovering your lie or not ... and if there is no difference, there is no need for roll.
Hmm, if I were her I’d prefer to know I was lying and be able to kill me there and then, rather than to potentially have me warn the grove the goblins were on their way, let me call the attack at a time of my choosing, and have to fight me and the tieflings at the same time. But that is getting into the weeds. If I didn’t independently want the opportunity to register with the game that I was lying in this instance in particular, I probably wouldn’t care all that much about whether Minthara had the chance to catch me out. And I’ve already said that this is something I do really want, so I won’t further belabour the point.
