Larian Studios Forums Baldur's Gate III Baldur's Gate III - General Transmogrification

Originally Posted by 7d7

A. You didn't answer my point. You answered statement I did not make e.g. I never made the argument to not have visuals.

This sentence makes no sense to me ...

Originally Posted by 7d7

B. Yes in that case value could be 0 or negative (if you don't like the look of it). If you didn't assign value to item look you wouldn't want transmog in the first place as you d be indifferent to it.

As stated abowe ... someone will.
You realize this game sold several millions of copies right?

Originally Posted by 7d7

It is a well proven fact in economy that rarity drives value.

It is a well proven fact in economy, that value of things differst from person to person.

Originally Posted by 7d7

C. Except as far I can see you are requesting time to be dedicated to this. I request nothing on that front.

Thats not what i asked.

Also ... why do you care?
Its not your time that is supposed to be "dedicated" to anything ... nor your place to decide what it will be dedicated to.

Originally Posted by 7d7

D. I don't need to, I simply go with what the artist vision is. However if I wanted to change appearance yes I would clearly look at modding post launch for more variety.

And what do you want a medal?
Do, or do not ... nobody cares.

Originally Posted by 7d7

E. I am unaware of this as I don't look at datamined content.

Well, now you are.

Originally Posted by 7d7

Attacking the credibility of a contradictor is not a good way to counter his argument.

M hm ...
I see you follow your own rules, huh?

Originally Posted by 7d7

But, I have a few 100s of hours in EA and usually play with spell casters (sorcerer mostly, planning a sorlock for launch). Argument is valid for weapons too. I ll go for that epic dagger or staff over my starting staff.

Good for you ... i gues? O_o
Now why does it bother you that i dont?

Originally Posted by 7d7

F. You never said transmog would be constrained.

You didnt even bother to read this topic, did you?

Originally Posted by 7d7

Why would you be unhappy of someone fantasing about wearing a battleaxe or full plate even if he cannot equip them?

Me? I dont give a shit. xD

For all i care, people can transmog their Greataxes into fishes ... i wouldnt, but i never tell people what they can or cannot do in their own game. :P

//Edit:
You know what?
Lets try different approach ... honest one ... you dont like it, i dont care, how about stick to that instead.

A. It is pretty clear. It is also called using a straw man. To not answer my point you make a different one and answer that one.

B. Well the pool is about views. B is demonstrating transmog can affect your attraction to items (utility function if you want to be precise) regardless of an user using that feature. It is pretty important.

C. I simply replied to your point.

D. No I don't. That's simply the normal course of action? Again because it is a video game it doesn't make it a lesser art form vs. Songs or Movies. E.g. I despised the last jedi and simply opt out of watching the last installment.

E. I try not to. Apologies if I offended you in any way.
Again I am arguing my points. I do not bother with what you value or not. I doesn't impact me as that feature is not implemented. I simply justify why it make sense it stays that way.

F. I did. You never requested people answer to your specific vision of what transmog could be. I answered the general concept. Of course you could make it less intrusive. But in itself that accepting the concept, used without limitation will be bothering you in some ways. Which is contradicting your claim one should enjoy the game in whichever way it pleases them.

Edit: that's ok. And remember if it not there you can still use mods ;-)