What evidence do you have to support this claim?
Either of us have none ... that was the point when i said:
And both those assumes are perfectly fine ...
Except none of them have any value, since we have litteraly no data to support them.
See?
We both just asume ... there is nothing deeper.
When it comes to stealth, you were one exception, that I can think of, listing a beneficial effect current implementation had for your playstyle earlier in this thread. For that I thank you.
OH thank you! ^_^
You made my evening a bit happier.
Even tho even i must admit that there are some things on Stealth that could be better ... i would rate curent implication as 5/6 out of 10.
Its acceptable, but still have potential to be so much better.
So changing this would only benefit players who min-max and nothing would change for more casual players.
So its a win-win situation, then. Those who care, get what works for them, those who don't, don't mind either way.
That seems incomplete ...
Those would care, gets what works for them ...
Those who dont, wouldnt mind either way ...
That is both true ...
But none of them uses it ... so ... and pardon my rudeness, why even take them under concideration? O_o
I mean, if there even is any thinking about removal of something ... shouldnt main concern be about people who actualy use that thing and therefore have something to loose?
Rather than people who wants it gone and people who dont care?
