I'm sorry if you found anything I said rude - that wasn't the intention. I understand if your personal experiences have been to the contrary of the established situation, and that's neat for you if they have been, but it doesn't change the way things are overall. Appeals to seniority and appeals to authority have no weight here - otherwise I'd be touting the fact that I've worked on official 5e content myself, and know far more of the ins and outs of it than most people, as the back-up for the things I say; I don't do that, because I dislike making such appeals - they don't help share knowledge or understanding, they're just used to try to end arguments or quiet people, which is not helpful... I prefer to let explanation and reasoning hold its own.
Using the video link, for example, is an attempt to make an appeal to authority, but I don't recognise the video-maker's authority on this topic, at all. They're a person with a non-objective opinion that happens to post that opinion on youtube; they're pretty sensationalist about it, and use a lot of theoretical strawmen in their dialogue to facilitate their 'tear-down'. They're not there to give informative or objective information - they're there to make an impression.
Back on topic, since you elected not to acknowledge or respond to it, I'm glad that you've at lest taken on board the issues with the present situation regarding saving throw spells as they currently exist in BG3's EA.
