I don't think it is asked too much to just acknowledge player decisions.
Right.
But what I am saying and trying to give examples of is that sometimes it is. So the options are kind of...
Do you want choices that actually matter and can lead to different interesting outcomes, but sequels may have to choose a canon or miss out on some of your choices?
Or do you want choices that just matter way less and don't lead you off into interesting different outcomes, but keep you more on the same rail?
Because when you listen to the gaming community at large they want choice and consequence that actually matter and change the game in significant ways.
This reminds me of the stuff Pawel Sasko, one of the Cyberpunk 2077 devs, was talking about the other day. People were asking them to open up everything in the game, to make it so they can go into every building and open everything up. People have been asking for that from the beginning and saying things like - "We don't think it is too much to ask" as well. But he laid it out for them in a semi-technical way and explained that if they did that it would take years of work to properly do it AND it would become so demanding on systems that not very many people would be able to afford the hardware to actually play it.
But you say that you write stories and I say this honestly... if you are a good enough writer where you can come up with an epic story that tens of millions of people are interested in. You can come up with a world, protagonist, supporting characters and then write out all of their choices, a branching narrative and consequence... then also while writing keep in mind that you must be able to account for every choice while also staying within budget/time constraints of a project like Baldur's Gate 3 AND at the same time take any potential sequels into account...
Then you should make a video game, because you would likely be an insanely wealthy individual.
