Granted - the testimony we have is just those present and talking right now, which is a tiny smattering of people
At least you recognize the limitations of your sample set.
The next step is reject conclusions based off of biased small sample sizes.
Also, the RNG IS bad ^.^ This has been tested and demonstrated with a sufficiently large data set already, a long time ago... but it's beside the point here.
I remember that thread as well.
The only thing it demonstrated was the woeful lack of understanding most of the folks involved had about statistics.
Point being, as is the point of the thread - Saves are in a position in BG3 right now that many players are feeling pushed away from using them at all,
Again system changes based on an incredibly small sample size's perception of RNG are not advisable.
After 1000+ hours of play-testing it is not my experience that saves are made at an unreasonable rate nor has it caused me in any way to change my spell selection in game.
I, however, am just a single data point amongst many and do not speak for anyone's experience but my own.
This forum is designed for feedback, so please keep giving your personal feedback.
Larian will balance that feedback with actual data and make their decisions accordingly.
