Gale is an obvious good companion. He always stands up for the innocent, he always favors negotiation over violence, he always feels guilt for doing something bad. Oh, wait, if you hate BG3 - you can ignore this and say that there are no good companions. I mean, Wyll is evil right? He helps innocents just to get paid!! Surely his bravado completely negates all of his deeds. I mean, a devil pact?! Must be bad full stop.
No. Both Gale and Wyll are clearly neutral and definitely not good-aligned. Their character backgorunds are clearly neutral as good-aligned characters would not have done what they both have done. Furthermore, Larian themselves have stated the companions introduced thus intentionally did NOT include any good-aligned companions. Neutral characters can support "good" actions, just as they will also be okay with "evil" actions, so long as they can justify those actions either way. That's the whole point of being neutral.
Also, keep your passive-aggressive bs to yourself.
