Originally Posted by Niara
You're not wrong for the most part - Someone should probably tell Larian though, as they don't seem to be aware of it. Especially:

Originally Posted by FrostyFardragon
The computer can handle a much greater number, and much more diverse, foes than a human DM;
[and]
battle maps are often larger, making ranged combat more important relative to melee, etc.

These two things Larina's vision of D&D is drastically inferior and unsatisfying, compared to normal table top games. Most especially that last one.

The second one I think they are aware of, considering that spell/attack ranges were cut or adjusted compared to D&D tabletop. As for the first one - do you think that battle encounters in BG3 can be more balanced if the amount of enemies per encounter gets lower? I think it could be a healthy change both in terms of reducing the overwhelming amount of factors that mingle with your concentration and in terms of increasing the value of Saving Throw Spells. If the enemies were fewer but bulkier.

Last edited by neprostoman; 27/12/22 11:38 AM. Reason: typo