Not sure whether you’re not understanding Elessaria’s point, Lastman, or I’m not. But there really doesn’t seem to be any cause for argument here.

The OP said that the rogue is disadvantaged in BG3 compared to 5e due to the fact they can only sneak attack with their main attack. Elessaria agreed in general, but pointed out that there is actually one situation in which they’re advantaged compared to 5e in that if they have two actions they can feasibly get a ranged and melee sneak attack in one turn, which they couldn’t per 5e RAW. Elessaria didn’t say this was a good thing, and in fact agreed that it would be better to revisit sneak attack mechanics, just noted it as a matter of fact about the way sneak attack is currently implemented.


"You may call it 'nonsense' if you like, but I've heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary!"