The question shouldn't be whether BG3 should move its full release date, it should be whether Starfield will end up delayed again, or will release so broken that its real launch is like 1-2 months afterwards, as is the usual case with recent western RPGs by the big developers.
When any game is a bit bugged there is an outcry for months. When a Bethesda game is absolutely broken, people shrug and say that mods will fix it. Starfield will be no exception.
Maybe. I read a few months ago that the game was in a pretty bad state but MS was pushing Bethesda to release anyway. Hopefully the extra time is enough, but MS is definitely a new factor in the Bethesda-jank equation.
While it sold well and a decent reception, Fallout 4 did rub a lot of fans the wrong way and Fallout76 was heavily derided, so I’m interested in seeing how much the tolerance of the fans can be stretched.
