Being an Oath Breaker does not necessarily mean evil alignment. It basically means you have turned away from your oath as you understood it. It also can mean you have turned evil. The 3rd(?) edition Blackguard would only fit here if you took some levels of rogue; however, an oath breaker can fit the role of the traditional “anti-Paladin”. Originally those two classes were pegged for use outside of the LG restrictions. In fact Queen Vlackath(sp) had many of her knights as Anti-Paladins.
But back to my original comment. Not all OBs are traditionally evil. My oath breaker (that started out as an old fallen paladin to Blackguard (talk about OP), broke his “oath” at the time by an alignment change to TN. He became dissatisfied with how the gods use ppl as pawns in their eternal wars and, risking being forced into the blood wars or the wall, he decided to fight the overwhelming influence of these gods in the lives of men. He knew the powers he received were from corrupted sources, but he didn’t worship this source. He would do all he could to break the powers of the Druids/clerics and set the ppl free to grow and prosper.
In this game he will not joine the goblins, will resist the Absolute, save the tieflings by feeding the grove idol to Gale. In his mind the tieflings are innocent and the followers of the Absolute and the Druids are doing exactly what he despises about the gods. In his mind, he is a hero to the ppl, yet those that represent big religious movements hate him… And since most government organizations are theocratic in nature, the bounties on his head are many. His preferred form of governance are republic or democracy. A just secular king is also fine in his eyes.
