I’m no expert in aesthetics, but I do know that one of the big bones of contention in that subject is how much, if anything, authorial intent has to do with something being art. If authorial intent isn’t essential then there doesn’t seem any in principle reason why AIs shouldn’t create art, but if it is then unless and until AI develops the ability to have intentions, humans might be able to use AI as a tool to create art but AI wouldn’t be able to create art spontaneously.
The big problem of arguing this angle is that at the end of the day what constitutes "actual, genuine, real, human art" is relevant only for a minuscule fraction of the people who will make use of these tools.
And it will matter less and less as they will improve over time and people will need to be warned upfront about what's genuine and what not.
A lot of people will be perfectly fine with "Sure, let's say this isn't real art. Still serves perfectly well any purpose I needed this image for".
. So given the the topic of the thread isn’t the nature of art and whether AI can create it, I will at least not take us further off piste into that topic here.