PLEASE give us some sort of update to her
No ...
Just no!
Lae'zel is perfect as she is, and if someone dont like her, THERE IS ENOUGH OTHER COMPANIONS TO PICK ...
Dont just make everyone sweet and fuzzy as all other games. -_-
There is finaly some real character and people want to ruin it.
Uh. Enough companions to pick?! Is this joke of the year? Out of a <Baldur's gate> 3 roster of 7 whooping companions. The RPG choices we have are just outstanding.
Right.
Boy how have standards dropped. Quality over quantity I guess is the excuse. Apart from a character or two, I am not seeing nor the quality or quantity.
It's worth noting that the number of companions in a game is not necessarily an indicator of its overall quality. While Baldur's Gate 1 had only 6 companions, it was still widely regarded as a classic RPG, and the success of that game led to the development of Baldur's Gate 2.
Similarly, while Baldur's Gate 2 had a much larger roster of companions, it did not necessarily lead to the immediate creation of Baldur's Gate 3. Game development is a complex process that involves many factors beyond just the number of available companions.
That being said, it's important to note that the quality of the companions is often more important than the quantity. It's possible that Baldur's Gate 3 will have fewer companions than Baldur's Gate 2, but if they are well-written, well-developed characters, then the game could still be a success.
Ultimately, the success of a game depends on a variety of factors, including gameplay mechanics, story, world-building, and character development. While the number of companions is one aspect of a game, it is not necessarily the most important or the only factor that contributes to its overall quality.
