Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Originally Posted by stevelin7
i think that you was talking about lawful evil
Nope.
Any evil ...

Originally Posted by stevelin7
i was talking "the evil" is that "the dark evil" that is evil natural and evil chaos fundamental, the dark evil will only lead our player character to the bad ending.
Yes, i gathered as much ... and i still think that our chaotic evil characters should have option to suceed.

I mean, the main goal (as it seems right now) will be to "defeat the Absolute" ...
And that is something everyone should be able to do ...

I would have no problem with our character who did certain choices to have that kind of "now you can rule over dead, scorched land, idiot" ending ... or if they would try to take her place, but failed in that ... but still, they should have chance to suceed in main goal, wich is defeating the Absolute.

I admit that writing satisfying Chaotic Evil ending is hard ...
But while dooming it to failure is easy, its also pretty lame. -_-

i think this should be the problem of "God and Devil" in Christianity for the example.

in DnD, we should see the problem as "God of the gods" vs "Omen".

if you choose the way of the "natural evil combines chaotic evil", you are one of the chosen ones of the Omen, you acturally bring the ruin of the toril if you can implement your steps to the final.

this is as warcraft 3 -- arthas menethil.

but your player character never be the true protagonist, this will bring the true savior's birth, just your playercharacter isn't the true protagonist.
and the savior is the fruit that God desires.

Last edited by stevelin7; 29/04/23 01:32 PM.