question whether the necessary response to 'the evil companions are too snarky' is that we need three new companions exclusive to good players
I cant imagine any better response. O_o
It's more a question of 'why would Larian keep writing characters that won't stay in an evil player's party when none of the evil party members have any conflicts with a good player?
Oh ... well ... this sounds like completely different question tho.
I see no problem with Larian writing characters exclusive for "a path" ... no matter if its good, or evil one ...
On the contrary!
I believe that exclusivity of companions can only add to depth felt behind our actions and decisions!
The fact that scales should be ballanced i finded so obvious, i didnt felt any need to mention it specificaly tho.
It was said countless times that picking either side in this conflict should have impact on our party members ... to me, it makes no sense that:
1) Lae'zel is completely fine with us "helping theese pathetic teethlings, and serching false hope in help from this druid" ... and i think she hould leave, without a debate ... just as Wyll do, if you join Goblins ...
Also, even if you join Goblins, she should want to leave ... just as Gale do ... in my opinion, bcs no matter the side we pick, this is just delay that should annoy her ... but Minthara is at least close to her mindset, to it would make sense to me that she would at least approve side we picked.
2) Astarion is completely fine with us "wasting time with theese pathetic civilians" ... in my honest opininion, he should want to leave ... just as Gale do ... but should be easily persuated to stay and enjoy killing some Goblins.
And even afterwards, i feel like there should be a way to refill our party with fresh blood after (or rather shortly after) our party members leaves us.
Prefferably with new companions ofc ... but in worst case scenario, with mercenaries of classes we just lost.
But it important here to keep in mind that story after the battle of the Grove (if we ally with Goblins) leads to location that is not part of EA ... so we dont really know what it will bring.
And it also conflicts with a Shadowheart as a romance option, as well as Gale, even if you convince him to stay.
Wich seems perfectly reasonable ...
Since sadistic, psychopatic, homicidal ... but also kinda hot ... maniac just claimed you for the night.
Also, all that blood and violence feels like mood killer, doesnt it?
Even if Minthara ends up as an evil-exclusive companion, which some indications point towards the possibility, that's woefully unbalanced and the math's right there to prove it.
Oh yes, certainly ...
Even if ... we just lost a Warlock in order to gain a Paladin ... not exactly ballanced deal either.
(It seemed even worse, back in the days when Minthara was a Cleric.)
But as mentioned abowe ... and in multiple other threats:
Just bcs we dont know about any other companions, it doesnt mean they wont exist.
Larian "had to" speak about Jaheira and Minsc ... bcs those are big names, names that ensure that people will be talking about Baldur's Gate III ... i see that as purely marketing move.
Also, those two was basically allready spoiled about a year and half ago, so why bother to hide it?
But im quite sure (feel free to read as: i hope very much) there will be Evil companions for us to obtain.
I for one really hope we get option to recruit Dror Ragzlin, Nere, or some of those Half-Orcs we have seen in last few cinematics aswell ...
But lets be honest, if they would leave out such anouncement, it wouldnt have nearly even half as big effect ... if any in the first place.
I mean, im sure there are some famous Evil companions from previous games that "could have" appear here ... but statistic suggest that Good companions are just more popular ... and hardly anyone can compare with Minsc and Jaheira, in matter of fame.
So in short, fingers crossed!