I might play a druid. Perhaps they’re an initiate into the Shadow Druids. Perhaps they’re from the Emerald Grove or have visited it in the past, or have at least heard of it and Halsin. I’m a ranger, perhaps I or whoever I’m working for knows something about a spate of mass abductions or disorder caused by a new cult and I’ve been looking into it. As a cleric, my temple might have been disturbed by news of a new deity, or someone pretending to be one.
As i read trough this, it feels like a shame that nobody brought up this topic like year or two earlier ...
You know, in times where such implementation would be much easier > and therefore much more probable.
As a rogue (or criminal), I might be attached to the Baldur’s Gate thieves guild, the Shadow Thieves or even the Zhentarim in a junior capacity, or be an independent operator potentially with knowledge of people in these factions.
This i dont like tho ...
Rogues are my main reason why i hate class stereotypes, so many people see them as just Thieves, Spies, or Assassins ... but that is not what Rogue is. :-/
Main translation of Rogue into my language is "Tulák" ... meaning Wanderer.
Meaning in my mind that yes, Rogue can be any (or all) of those three things, but they can also be so much more ... and it makes me sad that so many people who is using stereotypes is forgetting.
I dunno, maybe im just weird, but my Rogues were allways more like Geralt (from books, except for shorter swords, or straight forward just daggers), basicaly just an agile warior that is not ashamed of using some dirty tricks in battle, with his own codex of honor and quite unconventional set of skills.
