Na, we're good buddy, no offence taken. I think for me, I like to ask people 'if you ignore all the marketing of Cyberpunk completely, ignore everything that you expected it to be from the marketing, how does it stand on it's own?' When most people talk about the flaws of Cyberpunk, they talk about the expectations, bad performance on old consoles, how it's 'not an rpg', and how the hype was over the top and fans were toxic. All of that is tru-ish (although I think it's just as much of an RPG if not more than the Witcher 3), but it doesn't speak to the game itself really.
I personally consider Witcher3 more of a narrative open world action game, but let's not argue about the definition. I also think that even if Witcher3 seemingly shares similar issues to Cyberpunk, that it is not a problem in one doesn't mean it is not a problem in the other.
