Originally Posted by Sozz
We know there's a murderer, we know that in the last twenty days 3 people have been killed, we haven't really seen the first two bodies so how can we really rule them out?
We don't know if they are connected. the first two murders brought no attention. We can have a serial killer creating elaborate tableaus and just someone who is unlucky and gets killed at the same time in an unrelated murder.




Originally Posted by The Red Queen
This is hyperbole I hope smile? I don't think there's any need for wild frustration, as I'm sure that whatever route we end up going we will uncover interesting stories and snippets of lore and get to know the city, which I imagine is the main point of the game. I also wouldn't be at all surprised if it's rigged so that no matter which way we go we'll uncover the truth in the end, though the order in which we visit the locations might influence exactly the events we see or at least the context in which we interpret them. I think we are all probably safe to relax and enjoy the ride!

Ultimately it depends on the kind of adventure this is. If we are required to go to every place regardless then it doesn't matter. If our choices don't actually alter the story then again, it doesn't really matter. But if they are actually can prevent deaths, if this is dynamic as it can be then making choices based on the latest mentioned location instead of a logical location makes the situation frustrating.