Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Originally Posted by Beechams
iii. If you can choose Oathbreaker at level 1 then you aren't much of a Paladin really.
What makes you say that?
Dont we create an adult character that lived and existed for some time allready, and therefore should have opourtunity to break his oath before?

I meant while you are still at level 1 and decide to break the oath (rather than at CC). IMO it would be better just to have the option to be a Blackguard/Anti-Paladin at CC.



Originally Posted by Buba68
Originally Posted by Beechams
iii. If you can choose Oathbreaker at level 1 then you aren't much of a Paladin really.
iv. I'm in the Blackguard/Anti-Paladin camp.
Depends on your perspective - if for you Paladin means LG and thereabouts, then yes, III is true.
I - although a "traditionalist" in many ways, prefer to see Paladins in a broader sense, as "Holy Warriors" available to all deities i.e. allignments.

Unless you go completely off the rails then I don't think you should go straight from LG to CE for one mistake. Some games (e.g. Pathfinder?) give a notice that 'your action has moved you two points to chaotic' or whatever.
Were not Paladins 'traditionally' human only? laugh