Its not beastality when it's consenting magical beasts with the intelligence of humans. Also it's pretty dang hypocritical of you to be fine with bg1 and bg2 as it's hard to argue a mortal could ever properly concent to being impregnated by a god. Especially with Baal's whole plan
No one is making such a ridiculous argument because what Bhaal did was mass sexual violence and assault and he was recognized as an evil god. And yet oddly none of these sexual assaults were considered to be legitimate and desirable "romance" options because it is a line that should simply not be crossed, even in a fantasy video game. Child and animal abuse are also lines that should not be crossed or encouraged and not be available for players to even be tempted to participate.
And this is the last I'm going to make of this argument. I typically don't participate in the forums much even though I've been playing Larian's games for many years, but finding out about this bear thing has really made me seriously unhappy and I've said what I want to say about it. I have no further interest in arguing back and forth for the next 20 or more posts, so I won't. I'll see what the game is actually like by the time it comes out for Xbox and make my final decision at that point, but right now I'm feeling glad that I have many other games in my backlog to play.
Its a concentual act between too characters. It's not animal abuse.
Also Abazigal was in the original games so again you are being hypocritical.
Massive difference between alluding to actions and showing them in detail.
Remember the human (This is a forum for a video game):
