Now that one level in wizard is one level in bard, cleric, druid or sorcerer when multiclassed into...
What should be the starting class of the chosen one? The blessed almighty, the 12/12/12/12/12 wizard-druid-cleric-sorcerer-bard?
There's got to be only a handful of variations that are meta. Which is the absolute best?
Also, does that mean all casters are charisma mains now for full story optimization, or would my wizard spells suffer? Do we even need wizards or druids anymore? I feel like a wizard is a joke next to the majesty of the sorcerer-bard... that's maybe also a full time warlock. And a paladin
Who will win?
The druid-cleric class (now one class)
The bard-sorcerer class (now one class)
The stinky wizard that's, I dunno. Also an int fighter or rogue subclass. We all joked about Gale backstabbing people, but that's not how I imagined it 🤔
I'd just be blunt - multiclassing in 5e suck ass. On surface it might sounds like cool idea, and you might get lots from it. But in reality, how multiclassing designed in 5e, you far likely will lose way more than you gain. For once you deny yourself highelevel abilities of original class, as well as high(er) level spells. Not metioning that most of the good stuff from other classes also comes on higher levels. And to get there you will just waste your levels, as they likely will give nearly zero synergy to your original class.
D&D 3.5e/PF1e at least had great variety of prestige classes, with good number of "power" prestige classes. And Pathfinder also had huge number of subclasses.
PF2e is a great example of how "multiclassing" should be done. It doesn't allow you anything outrageously broken, but at the same time gives you huge amount of options to further customize your build.