Except it is limiting. It is non inclusive to have all romances be bisexual and willing to have sex with any race. I find it insulting, and it by default it makes the characters worse because it majes them come across as 'less real'. I prefer da/da2 over da3 overall, but da3 did a better job here. The anti hetero abd anti gay agenda with 8 bisexual romances is insulting, non inclusive, and lazy design.
Also, FYI, women in life do not usually like their men being attracted to other men. We men, sunce were biologically kerveets, atent as set against lesbian sex, but that is another discussion. So, it is sexist against women.
Bottom line there seems to be a lot of cop defend all bisexual romances despite all limiting, anti roleplaying, and poor writing in its very existence.
Still, this is small potatoes compared to the fact there are zero hot dwarven women to bang. Lmao
And, no heterosexual and gsys atent being 'pandered' to. Both gays and hers have zero romances geared to them. Lmao Its all bisexual romances.
um....yeaaaah.....probably better off if I don't respond to most of those positions you have there.
Anyways. 'Everyone is pansexual' is a necessary compromise to make sure everyone has the maximum number of romance options. I mean, yeah maybe it would be ideal for everyone to have their own sexual orientation because not everyone is Pansexual IRL, but I can guarantee that we'd be having this conversation again, but with even more vitriol if the romances were divided evenly gay/straight/pansexual. Like can you imagine if the most conventionally-attractive companion, Shadowheart was Lesbian? We'd never hear the end of it. Having everyone be pansexual might not be real-to-life, but it's always some serious bad feels when you can't romance whom you want. Remember BG II when all straight women had was Anomen, and gay female characters had to settle for getting their soul sucked out by an Alu-fiend or gay men getting an erotic massage from a drow slave? I do.
