Seriously stop sayin BS because you like a feature lol. No Gale as a Barbarian, Shadowheart as a Druid and Lae'Zel as a bard does not make any sense story-wise.
I also thought that multiclassing would have been enough... But it looks like Larian does not care to offer companions a narrative that doesn't make any sense for the sake of gameplay choices. Definitely something I'm not in line with.
They could’ve written all the companions with storylines that were in no way connected with nature, or with devotion to a particular god, or with being an archwizard in love with Mystra, or with being in a pact with a devil, or with being an arch Druid. Larian chose to write the companions that way. Now it’s just like… these premises to companions dont matter.
EDIT: Most DOS2 companions did not have class built into story, except MAYBE Sybille. They were written in a way that de-emphasised class. Not so here.
Last edited by Zerubbabel; 12/07/2301:45 PM.
Remember the human (This is a forum for a video game):
