Originally Posted by mrfuji3
Originally Posted by Silver/
Cha checks and Con STs are not that good. The way racial AC boosts are, it only helps if you don't wear armour. They already have a breath attack that's bad because it doesn't scale well. A bite/claw attack will just be version 2.0 of that... aside from competing with said breath attack on how often you can case use it, probably.
What's bad about Cha checks and Con STs??? Con STs are one of the Big 3 saving throws and Persuasion/Intimidation checks are huge in a D&D game, especially as one as full of dialogue and characters as BG3 looks to be. They're also features present in other races, in some form. E.g.,
- A full Dwarven feature is devoted to Con ST-related things (poison)
- The EGtW Dragonblood gets Forceful Presence - Adv on one Persuasion & Intimidation check per day.

Not the way I was suggesting a boost to AC. I was suggesting a +1 bonus on top of any armor. But also, these are just sample suggestions I thought of in a minute and serve more as ideas of areas that could be turned into Dragonborn Racial Features. My main idea there was [some form of damage prevention].

Larian could make the breath weapon and/or claw attacks scale better then. There's no reason for them to not scale?
You may suggest that, but that's just not how armour works. Con ST don't matter for 10% of the time Dragonborn are impacted in combat through not having dark vision. Act 2 will bring A LOT more low light areas, anyone without dark vision is a liability. You can only artificially give dark vision to one person. So yes, that's not enough to save the Dragonborn. I'd be against a boost to all cha checks since, I'm sorry, but it just makes no sense to me. It reminds me of the argument that strenght should count for intimidation checks.