A. You didn't answer my point. You answered statement I did not make e.g. I never made the argument to not have visuals.
B. Yes in that case value could be 0 or negative (if you don't like the look of it). If you didn't assign value to item look you wouldn't want transmog in the first place as you d be indifferent to it.
It is a well proven fact in economy that rarity drives value.
C. Except as far I can see you are requesting time to be dedicated to this. I request nothing on that front.
D. I don't need to, I simply go with what the artist vision is. However if I wanted to change appearance yes I would clearly look at modding post launch for more variety.
E. I am unaware of this as I don't look at datamined content. Attacking the credibility of a contradictor is not a good way to counter his argument. But, I have a few 100s of hours in EA and usually play with spell casters (sorcerer mostly, planning a sorlock for launch). Argument is valid for weapons too. I ll go for that epic dagger or staff over my starting staff.
F. You never said transmog would be constrained. Why would you be unhappy of someone fantasing about wearing a battleaxe or full plate even if he cannot equip them?
