A. You didn't answer my point. You answered statement I did not make e.g. I never made the argument to not have visuals.
B. Yes in that case value could be 0 or negative (if you don't like the look of it). If you didn't assign value to item look you wouldn't want transmog in the first place as you d be indifferent to it.
You realize this game sold several millions of copies right?
It is a well proven fact in economy that rarity drives value.
C. Except as far I can see you are requesting time to be dedicated to this. I request nothing on that front.
Also ... why do you care?
Its not your time that is supposed to be "dedicated" to anything ... nor your place to decide what it will be dedicated to.
D. I don't need to, I simply go with what the artist vision is. However if I wanted to change appearance yes I would clearly look at modding post launch for more variety.
Do, or do not ... nobody cares. 
E. I am unaware of this as I don't look at datamined content.
Attacking the credibility of a contradictor is not a good way to counter his argument.
I see you follow your own rules, huh?
But, I have a few 100s of hours in EA and usually play with spell casters (sorcerer mostly, planning a sorlock for launch). Argument is valid for weapons too. I ll go for that epic dagger or staff over my starting staff.
Now why does it bother you that i dont?
F. You never said transmog would be constrained.
Why would you be unhappy of someone fantasing about wearing a battleaxe or full plate even if he cannot equip them?
For all i care, people can transmog their Greataxes into fishes ... i wouldnt, but i never tell people what they can or cannot do in their own game. :P//Edit:
You know what?
Lets try different approach ... honest one ... you dont like it, i dont care, how about stick to that instead.
