Not really. Because I tend to play 'good guys' (at least first time through); I only fight in self defense or defend others or to end anti dwarf racists' life aka all of larian joinable npcs. Also, when I do choose to play an 'evil' path, I 100% am not playing myself just like Anthony Hopkins is not a cannibal unlike Hannibal Lector who is a character he plays. I think Larian meant it as a fun 'haha' joke but some of the defenses for it seem off just like a lot of the complaining about it annoys me, too.
Like I said previously in another thread, even in FO where you had the option to kill kids, I never did even if I was playing a 'villain'. But, I'm glad the option was there so I could play the non child killer by choice.
As for your reply to my example... I doubt many would agree with you on it, but at least you are consistent in your reasoning so points for that.
And, I'm not a 'wreck' over the bear sex. In fact, I've defended its inclusion because I'm very anti censorship, and I don't care about the moral police. I just think the 'it's actuially a druid' is not a good way to defend and I gave a disgusting example why shapechange is not a good defense. Not to mention the physically implausiblities of such a pairing.
As for the whole adult who looks a child... there was a sad article about that very situation not long ago. It is really complex in that case. But, an exception to the rule doesn't prove the rule wrong. I personally could never have a romantic relationship with an adult who looked like a child. Maybe that makes me look immature. Maybe not. But, nope.
Overall, good interaction.
Last edited by Volourn; 17/07/23 06:11 AM.
