I mean, the fact that the tadpole has a whole progression system attatched to it is another bit of evidence that the anti-tadpole path is gonna have less content. And to be honest, I remain quite skeptical of Swen's big claims about how morally complex this game will be. Talk about no good path or evil path, but when one resolution to a quest is slaughtering innocent regufees and the other is slaughtering the cult that wants to kill those refugees, there's definitely a good and evil path.
You can also kill Zevlor and the tieflings by Khaga's orders or kill Khaga and the druids for Zevlor wich is more of a grey area. That being said I agree I don't expect many shades of gray.
I mean, the fact that the tadpole has a whole progression system attatched to it is another bit of evidence that the anti-tadpole path is gonna have less content.
We don't know that. Possibly, you get locked into a number of endings at some point. Using the tadpole could exclude content as well. Both the endgame and various quests. Even endings to companions' storylines, if they leave early enough because of your actions.
I agree, most people seem to think that ''evil'' path just has more of everything while I think going that path is going to take away a lot of content from you and it's going to prevent you from meeting or interacting with a lot of characters and prevent you from traversing cecrtain scenarios/situations.
