I was trying to come up with builds for the release and realized there's no point unless they tell us how the rules have been changed. I compared a Four Elements Monk with an Eldritch Knight / Wizard multiclass for a melee spellcaster type and it just raises too many questions.

How did they change the 4 Elements Monk? I think here's something Larian could actually improve, and it was mentioned they have done something. 5e is really stingy with the magic powers for these Monks so they might as well have called it Two Elements. 3 spells by level 11 is a bit of a joke. It's more like a teaser of all the cool elemental powers you could have and then they let you just spam one or two. So 1-2 more powers to their repertoire so you could actually get a power from all 4 elements for proper flavor if you want?

Will there be any point in playing an EK in the first place? It's a poorly designed subclass in 5e imo, and Battlemaster is much more functional because Combat Maneuvers actually work WITH Extra Attacks instead of against them (like EK's War Magic does). Another potential place for improvement if they are house ruling. Will the melee Cantrips that are kind of required to make EK work in tabletop be in BG3? Green Flame Blade and Booming Blade. I actually hope they won't and that EK's would get an ability to simply replace an attack with a Cantrip (or Spell) without having to use their BA to attack. The "EK Cantrips" are too gimmicky and class defining. Their abilities should be more about casting any spell while fighting without compromising their main feature, Extra Attacks. Will scrolls remain free for any class to use so that won't be an EK ability? And most importantly, how was multiclass spell progression changed? The lead systems dev mentioned something about getting Fireball sooner.