Originally Posted by Darth_Trethon
Originally Posted by Sansang2
Originally Posted by Darth_Trethon
It would arguably makes things easier but it would not lead to a better game. Less arguments about rule sets or rule changes and so on but D&D is still the best...at least for the time being.

I mean, obviously it's highly subjective, but D&D is not the best and never has been. It's just the most famous, it's the Justin Bieber of rpgs, and this comes from someone who really really likes 5e.

EDIT: I do partially agree thought with the idea of D&D crumbling in the next years. I don't really trust Jeremy Crawford, and I'm worried that under his direction the game with go back to being a dungeon crawler designed for lawyers more than humans.
This I cannot in good conscience agree with. 5e has been the gold standard for tabletop RPGs. It's not perfect, but nothing else gets even close, forget about better.

World of Darkness? I believe it has always been a better system. In the past few years the powered by the apocalypse clones are domming the indie industry. I never played it but I heard that, from the dungeon crawling point of view, even Shadow of the demon lord is better than 5e. I think that the great strenght of 5e are the official modules, I personally started DMing it because of BG3, because I wanted to make my friends play descent into avernus before BG3, and after that I dmed another official module. Sadly it's not that easy to find ready campaign for other systems because they are not as much famous.

... because it's fun!