Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2017
member
Offline
member
Joined: Sep 2017
Originally Posted by Volourn
Nah. It was very clearly an opinion. Saying something aucks us as much an opinion as "it was great". It is clearly subjective. Saying it bombed or was a success is factually right or factually wrong. Clearly a difference.

Should 99% of posts on this forum be marked as opinion at the start?

Afterall, someone Saying npc x us great or bad is clearly seen as opinion based. So should one's statement about a movie.

In my experience, a *lot* of people (especially in online forums) tend to believe their opinions represent objective facts, and state them as such.
So when mixing opinions with factual statements in a post and no indication what is supposed to be "just an opinion", it shouldn't come as a surprise when the whole post is being read as a factual statement.
That's why I'd indeed favor marking opinions as such (can for example be as easy as saying "*I think* it's an insult to all D&D players") which immediately takes away the vibe of you making a statement on behalf of all D&D players when you in fact mean to say it's an insult to *yourself* as D&D player.
Overall it helps a great deal hopefully focusing the discussion on why you feel that way, and not debate the truth of a claim you didn't even try to make.
Just a suggestion to save time + energy. Leaving this thread alone now.

Joined: Jul 2023
member
Offline
member
Joined: Jul 2023
Originally Posted by Xurtan
Tbh, I liked the film. Pudgy dragon <3
I loved the film. Loved. It.
I wish it did better at the box office so it could merit a sequel.

I think the idea to tie a movie to a game release is a great idea. The problem with a game might be that it is on a less predictable schedule than a movie. The last thing you want is to have the execs telling the game designers, "I don't care! You are releasing it on this date!" And remaining in a holding pattern for a game developer on a massive project is expensive. If they could nail the timing, though, that would be ideal.

Joined: Sep 2017
V
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
V
Joined: Sep 2017
"Pretty sure WoTC's shooting themselves in the foot with their OGL1.0 Drama killed some of the hype for that movie anyways, since it pissed off alot of us in the TTRPG community at the time, WoTC just really likes to pissed of their own clientbase half of the time with their own stupid decisions."

Agreed.


Wood Elves: They are brown skinned. Not black skinned. Not white skinned. But, they had black skinned surface elves. That is anti lore.

Drow are the black skinned elves. That's the lore.

There vis nothing wrong with dark skinned elves, but it needs to fit. Wood elves are not black like the drow. Stop trying to erase wood elves. Also, not all thise elves in that scene were wood elves most likely on top of that.


Bottom line the movie was not good. The actors mostly tried. The writing was awful, and the over hype by the media failed as well.

They should make an Icewind Dale Trilogy film.

Last edited by Volourn; 28/07/23 02:57 AM.
Joined: Nov 2020
P
addict
Offline
addict
P
Joined: Nov 2020
We've had surface Elves in Faerun with dark skin and afro-centric features since 2001, aka the 3e Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting. it's not new. Bye.

Joined: Oct 2020
N
old hand
Offline
old hand
N
Joined: Oct 2020
Wood elves have been able to be brown since atleast 3.5 e

That's a wood elf next to the drow, brown skin and dreads and all

https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/f...tt.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090526075945

Joined: Jan 2018
W
veteran
Offline
veteran
W
Joined: Jan 2018
1. Drow are not coded African in their appearance. They have straight, white hair and their skin is depicted ranging from shades of charcoal black to dark blue and purple.

2. There are surface elves whose appearances are coded to look African in the Forgotten Realms, and have been for some time.

3. The sorcerer from Honor Among Thieves was a half-elf.

4. This is a really dumb conversation.

Joined: Oct 2020
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Oct 2020
I hated the movie with a passion, to me it's on par with bad movies like the new Star Wars trilogy, many Marvel movies in recent years and Highlander 2. There was nothing about that movie I enjoyed, especially not the "humor"...

Joined: Aug 2021
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2021
Originally Posted by Kendaric
I hated the movie with a passion, to me it's on par with bad movies like the new Star Wars trilogy, many Marvel movies in recent years and Highlander 2. There was nothing about that movie I enjoyed, especially not the "humor"...

Mhm, I was hoping that comparison would help me, but I only watched two of the three Star Wars movies mentioned and none of the others.
Though looking at your profile picture does show me someone not appreciating humor.. =P (I am kidding, sorry if too much..)

I have rarely watch movies, but I have been unsure if I should watch this movie. So I do appreciate a bit mroe details (or comparisons) about why someone likes/dislikes the movie? If that is not too much work.

Originally Posted by OwlMort
As for the d&d beyond - they're currently working on integrating that with their upcoming 3d virtual table top/video game hybrid thing. So they're probably not going to divert resources from that to add a bg3 character importer.

I have heard such a thing before. Do you have a link to any information about that? I am curious, but am somehow too incompetent to find out more myself..

Joined: Feb 2022
Location: UK
Volunteer Moderator
Offline
Volunteer Moderator
Joined: Feb 2022
Location: UK
@Volourn, you have made your opinion clear, as have others who disagree with you. Please let's now drop the off topic subject of ethnicity of elves (or actors who play them).

I'm not even sure whether the quality of the film is relevant here, except insofar as if people didn't like it then they're less likely to want to see references to it in BG3. But for what it's worth, I just saw it a few days and thought it was good fun. Not perfect by any stretch, but enough to make me hope that the planned tie-in series by Paramount comes off.

About tie-ins more generally, I have my doubts. I think having lots of stuff like that up front can look like a cynical marketing ploy, as well as requiring more initial investment that increases financial risk if something doesn't sell as much as projected. I would hope that over time BG3 becomes more integrated into FR lore and other media, but think that's best for later rather than now assuming the game lands well and shows signs of longevity.


"You may call it 'nonsense' if you like, but I've heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary!"
Joined: Oct 2020
S
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
S
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by Warlocke
1. Drow are not coded African in their appearance. They have straight, white hair and their skin is depicted ranging from shades of charcoal black to dark blue and purple.

2. There are surface elves whose appearances are coded to look African in the Forgotten Realms, and have been for some time.

3. The sorcerer from Honor Among Thieves was a half-elf.

4. This is a really dumb conversation.
Yep, I agree with all of this, especially number 1, as someone with black heritage myself, claiming that drow is black coded is about as offensive that whole orc debate.

Last edited by Sai the Elf; 28/07/23 12:59 PM.
Joined: May 2019
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2019
WotC has been aggravating and alienating me for a couple of decades, and their OGL scandal and canceling a bunch of D&D video game projects earlier this year were the last straws for me. I was soooooo looking forward to those other D&D games, especially the ones being made by Hidden Path and OtherSide, and so I have zero positive feelings towards WotC and its future left in me now. WotC can drop dead as far as I'm concerned.

Joined: Dec 2020
B
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
B
Joined: Dec 2020
I don't like where WotC is taking the next iteration of D&D, but I guess their 'play-testers' do, so I will likely return to Pathfinder. That means leaving Faerun which is sad - I have very fond memories of TT games there as well as the BG games. So far the only PF cRPG's (as far as I know?) are by Owlcat - and those were not PF 2. I'd be keen to see something other than Warhammer from them at a later point, or from another studio. Wonder if Larian would ever make a PF game or if they are locked into some sort of agreement with WotC?

Joined: May 2019
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2019
Originally Posted by booboo
I don't like where WotC is taking the next iteration of D&D, but I guess their 'play-testers' do, so I will likely return to Pathfinder. That means leaving Faerun which is sad - I have very fond memories of TT games there as well as the BG games.
Yup, this is my only regret as well. I will very much miss my beloved Realms. But the glorious Realms I knew doesn't really exist anymore anyway.

And yeah, my TT gaming group and I have also dropped D&D and moved to PF 2e.

Joined: Jul 2023
T
stranger
Offline
stranger
T
Joined: Jul 2023
I don't care about these things, i just like dnd games... learnt most of my dnd lore through nwn 1 and 2 on rp servers its sad but i know some canon stuff anyways... Gaming politics are weird ya'll are nerds lol

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Dom_Larian, Freddo, vometia 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5