Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 12 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 11 12
Joined: Oct 2020
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Oct 2020
Knowing there's going to be a shapeshifting villain in the game opens up a lot of potentially interesting situations, particularly some creepy ones involving the romance plotlines.

Imagine a scenario where you defeat one of the game's main bosses merely because The Dark Urge compelled you to murder one of your companion or lover that one time. I suppose having Orin and the Dark Urge connected might preclude that.

I'm also interested how some scenes will play out when you might already know someone you're talking to is really Orin.

Joined: Apr 2013
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Originally Posted by Sozz
Knowing there's going to be a shapeshifting villain in the game opens up a lot of potentially interesting situations, particularly some creepy ones involving the romance plotlines.

Imagine a scenario where you defeat one of the game's main bosses merely because The Dark Urge compelled you to murder one of your companion or lover that one time. I suppose having Orin and the Dark Urge connected might preclude that.

I'm also interested how some scenes will play out when you might already know someone you're talking to is really Orin.
Don't know if you know or how many on this forum would know. But I get the same vibes from Orin as I got from Morinth in Mass Effect. And there is a lot of potential here...like is Lae'zel even a real person? What it it's just Orin stalking the party...not likely but could theoretically happen. Or if you could create an alliance with Orin where she kills and replaces one of your companions and nobody else at camp is the wiser. There's a lot of potential for this to develop in all sorts of ways.

Joined: May 2019
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2019
Originally Posted by Fox of Embers
Originally Posted by kanisatha
No, this is your take on the characters. If alignments were being used in the game, Halsin, Karlach, and Minsc would be good, Lae'zel, Astarion, Shadowheart, and Minthara would be evil, and Gale, Wyll, and Jaheira would be neutral (where neutral does NOT conveniently count as good).


So the man who tries to be a hero, if a flawed one, and will under no circumstances be convinced to attack the refugees is ..neutral? Why? His Pact was an act of desperation and a mistake, it does not damn him. He is at heart a good person that has massive flaws. That does not make him evil. Even if you can push his flaws to turn him evil.

Gale.. I have a hard time placing him. So I will not really argue against him being more neutral. (Though he also objects to siding with Minthara).

Jaheira was always Neutral Good. Her being Neutral was a mechanics thing. Harpers are a good organization that want to do good (though I dislike them). *She* wants to do good. She always wanted good actions in BG2 and was against any darker actions.

I am honestly curious why you see Jaheira or Wyll as neutral?
I think the issue is that you are falling into the same trap a lot of others do, which is to see things in a binary way where anyone who is not very explicity evil must then be good, with no meaningful consideration given to what being neutral represents. Simply not going along with evil acts does not make you good-aligned. Ditto for simply "approving" of good acts.

Also, the lore on the Harpers is very clear that they are not considered a truly good organization. They are the classical neutral entity, with a lot of members whose morality is at least very questionable. That's why Khelben Arunsen and Laeral Silverhand were constantly at odds with them, despite their having been instrumental in creating the organization, and why eventually they broke from the Harpers to create a new rival organization, the Silver Stars. The Harpers are very much an "ends justify the means" organization, which is definitely not good. And as for Jaheira specifically, no it wasn't just mechanics. She was very much always on the neutral side, and would simply (and very grumpily) go along with the good acts of a good PC. And from the little I've been able to see of her thus far, she is exactly that way in BG3, an "ends justify the means" character who will work with anyone, evil inclusive, so long as her interests are being served.

As for Wyll, it's a metter of one's perspective about making a pact with a devil. For you, it's a mistake borne of desperation. Fair enough. For me, it's an evil act. So even if it were under desperate circumstances, it fits the "ends justify the means" approach to things. But I am open to the view that he (way more so than SH) is a potentially "redeemable" character. But again I would note, we can here only talk about where each of these characters begins the game, and what their possible alignment is at the point when we first meet them. What happens afterwards entirely depends on the PC's actions, and therefore cannot be discussed in any meaningful way because it will vary from player to player and playthrough to playthrough.

Joined: Jul 2023
member
Offline
member
Joined: Jul 2023
Originally Posted by kanisatha
Originally Posted by Fox of Embers
Originally Posted by kanisatha
No, this is your take on the characters. If alignments were being used in the game, Halsin, Karlach, and Minsc would be good, Lae'zel, Astarion, Shadowheart, and Minthara would be evil, and Gale, Wyll, and Jaheira would be neutral (where neutral does NOT conveniently count as good).


So the man who tries to be a hero, if a flawed one, and will under no circumstances be convinced to attack the refugees is ..neutral? Why? His Pact was an act of desperation and a mistake, it does not damn him. He is at heart a good person that has massive flaws. That does not make him evil. Even if you can push his flaws to turn him evil.

Gale.. I have a hard time placing him. So I will not really argue against him being more neutral. (Though he also objects to siding with Minthara).

Jaheira was always Neutral Good. Her being Neutral was a mechanics thing. Harpers are a good organization that want to do good (though I dislike them). *She* wants to do good. She always wanted good actions in BG2 and was against any darker actions.

I am honestly curious why you see Jaheira or Wyll as neutral?
I think the issue is that you are falling into the same trap a lot of others do, which is to see things in a binary way where anyone who is not very explicity evil must then be good, with no meaningful consideration given to what being neutral represents. Simply not going along with evil acts does not make you good-aligned. Ditto for simply "approving" of good acts.

Also, the lore on the Harpers is very clear that they are not considered a truly good organization. They are the classical neutral entity, with a lot of members whose morality is at least very questionable. That's why Khelben Arunsen and Laeral Silverhand were constantly at odds with them, despite their having been instrumental in creating the organization, and why eventually they broke from the Harpers to create a new rival organization, the Silver Stars. The Harpers are very much an "ends justify the means" organization, which is definitely not good. And as for Jaheira specifically, no it wasn't just mechanics. She was very much always on the neutral side, and would simply (and very grumpily) go along with the good acts of a good PC. And from the little I've been able to see of her thus far, she is exactly that way in BG3, an "ends justify the means" character who will work with anyone, evil inclusive, so long as her interests are being served.

As for Wyll, it's a metter of one's perspective about making a pact with a devil. For you, it's a mistake borne of desperation. Fair enough. For me, it's an evil act. So even if it were under desperate circumstances, it fits the "ends justify the means" approach to things. But I am open to the view that he (way more so than SH) is a potentially "redeemable" character. But again I would note, we can here only talk about where each of these characters begins the game, and what their possible alignment is at the point when we first meet them. What happens afterwards entirely depends on the PC's actions, and therefore cannot be discussed in any meaningful way because it will vary from player to player and playthrough to playthrough.
While you make some interesting points, it kind of falls apart for me when you characterize Neutral as ends-justify-means. To me, Neutral is more about not being evil and protecting the innocent only if you feel like it, but Good is just as able to weigh action and consequence as anyone else and to decide whether they can live with a distasteful act that leads to a good consequence. This isn't a philosophical distinction; it is just based on fun. Good characters who must always do the good thing (as judged by the dev or DM) even if the consequence will be greater evil should be given the opportunity to choose instead. It will result in greater character development because they have to choose, followed with consequences of being wrong and all that, such as cynicism, guilt, etc.

It sure seems like Wyll is written to be more good than neutral, all the more edgy because of his patron.

Joined: Apr 2023
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2023
Shadowheart is the most obvious choice.

But Karlach second place? What’s up with that 😂

Joined: Sep 2017
V
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
V
Joined: Sep 2017
If you choose to make a pact with a devil you are evil. No exceptions. If said pact is 'forced' then there's wiggle room.

Joined: Oct 2021
Z
Jhe'stil Kith'rak
OP Offline
Jhe'stil Kith'rak
Z
Joined: Oct 2021
Question to all:

There is a train approaching a particular track. On this track is about 1,000 people who cannot move out of the way. You can change which track the train is on by pulling a lever, but the only way to pull the lever is to make a pact with a devil that owns the station. Is it more evil to make a pact with the devil to save 1,000 lives, or is it more evil to let 1,000 people die because you don't want to make a pact with the devil?


Remember the human (This is a forum for a video game):
Joined: Sep 2017
V
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
V
Joined: Sep 2017
Answer: Any pact made with the devil will lead to 10x that number being killed. And, that's lowballinh the number. So, making the pact is evil. Not making the last is, while sad, is the good choice. Sometimes there is no easy out. Devils feast on the weak, and twisted and corrupt them. That's literally how they work.

Joined: Apr 2023
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2023
Taking a pact with the devil means selling your own soul in exchange for saving 1000 lives. It’s an ultimate sacrifice in the name of good. The act itself is good, but it will lead to greater evil to corrupt your soul in the end.

Not taking a pact is selfish, but not really evil. People will die without your interference. But you’re not evil by choosing not to sacrifice your soul in order to save them.

Last edited by ladydub; 27/07/23 10:57 PM.
Joined: Dec 2020
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Dec 2020
Originally Posted by Zerubbabel
Question to all:

There is a train approaching a particular track. On this track is about 1,000 people who cannot move out of the way. You can change which track the train is on by pulling a lever, but the only way to pull the lever is to make a pact with a devil that owns the station. Is it more evil to make a pact with the devil to save 1,000 lives, or is it more evil to let 1,000 people die because you don't want to make a pact with the devil?

get outta here with that awful philosophical exercise.

[Linked Image from media.tenor.com]

Joined: Jul 2017
member
Offline
member
Joined: Jul 2017
Originally Posted by ladydub
But Karlach second place? What’s up with that 😂

My guess is that it's based on what was shown in the last Panel from Hell; her romance arc seems very nice, wholesome and "normal".

Originally Posted by Zerubbabel
There is a train approaching a particular track. On this track is about 1,000 people who cannot move out of the way. You can change which track the train is on by pulling a lever, but the only way to pull the lever is to make a pact with a devil that owns the station. Is it more evil to make a pact with the devil to save 1,000 lives, or is it more evil to let 1,000 people die because you don't want to make a pact with the devil?

Regardless of which is considered (more) evil, I'd not make the deal. Making deals with devils usually ends badly or at the very least massively in their favour. So I guess those people are minced meat. Though really, there's no reason to think all 1000 would die. Some would just be badly hurt and some would even get away with mere scratches.


Nobody's perfect... I'm a nobody.
Joined: Oct 2021
Z
Jhe'stil Kith'rak
OP Offline
Jhe'stil Kith'rak
Z
Joined: Oct 2021
Originally Posted by Silverstar
Originally Posted by Zerubbabel
There is a train approaching a particular track. On this track is about 1,000 people who cannot move out of the way. You can change which track the train is on by pulling a lever, but the only way to pull the lever is to make a pact with a devil that owns the station. Is it more evil to make a pact with the devil to save 1,000 lives, or is it more evil to let 1,000 people die because you don't want to make a pact with the devil?

Regardless of which is considered (more) evil, I'd not make the deal. Making deals with devils usually ends badly or at the very least massively in their favour. So I guess those people are minced meat. Though really, there's no reason to think all 1000 would die. Some would just be badly hurt and some would even get away with mere scratches.

Ah yes, trains. Infamous for leaving mere scratches in head-on collisions in philosophical thought experiments. What if it's everyone you know on the track, with their heads neatly arranged and fastened to the track right beneath where the train runs, such that everyone you know and/or love has their head split open and splattered if you don't make a deal with the devil?


Remember the human (This is a forum for a video game):
Joined: Sep 2022
F
addict
Offline
addict
F
Joined: Sep 2022
Originally Posted by ladydub
Shadowheart is the most obvious choice.

But Karlach second place? What’s up with that 😂

They plonked a pretty face on her model with a pleasant voice. Not to mention a large but well proportioned physique. Gym girls look great.

Personality-wise she's potty-mouthed but direct. Got less SH sass or Lae'zel spite. Seems to be a well intentioned too.

For combat, she's a heavy-hitter. Doesn't hurt having that.

Oh yeah, and she's also got that new girl sparkle.

Joined: Oct 2021
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Oct 2021
I suppose it depends on the price of the pact and my knowledge of what happens in the afterlife.

If, for example, I'm selling my soul so those thousand people get fifty more years of life and then they move on to a great after-life, what did I sell my soul for? Now I'm screwed, and just cause I delayed their glorious after-life for fifty years.

And what happens if I sell my soul? Do I get turned into a devil, and if I'm a devil, do I go around killing folks? Will I end up killing more than a thousand people?

Or will I be pushed inside some coin and fed to an infernal machine, disappearing forevermore after one excruciating moment of unbearable pain?

I'm gonna have to see this contract. I need details.

Joined: Apr 2020
O
stranger
Offline
stranger
O
Joined: Apr 2020
I dunno.

I'm just gonna roleplay my character and see if they vibe with anyone.

Joined: May 2019
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2019
Originally Posted by JandK
I suppose it depends on the price of the pact and my knowledge of what happens in the afterlife.

If, for example, I'm selling my soul so those thousand people get fifty more years of life and then they move on to a great after-life, what did I sell my soul for? Now I'm screwed, and just cause I delayed their glorious after-life for fifty years.

And what happens if I sell my soul? Do I get turned into a devil, and if I'm a devil, do I go around killing folks? Will I end up killing more than a thousand people?

Or will I be pushed inside some coin and fed to an infernal machine, disappearing forevermore after one excruciating moment of unbearable pain?

I'm gonna have to see this contract. I need details.
Yes, all this. The answer is: it depends, because the setup doesn't account for subsequent consequences from that decision to make that pact with a devil. Saving 1,000 today but being instrumental in the suffering/deaths of millions down the road is not a good deed.

Last edited by kanisatha; 28/07/23 02:45 PM.
Joined: Mar 2020
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2020
Originally Posted by kanisatha
I'm gonna have to see this contract. I need details.
Yes, all this. The answer is: it depends, because the setup doesn't account for subsequent consequences from that decision to make that pact with a devil. Saving 1,000 today but being instrumental in the suffering/deaths of millions down the road is not a good deed.[/quote]

Agreed. Which will impact the romances with either Wyll or Karlach. If I were DMing Decent to Avernus I would accept an ends-justify the means decision to use a soul coin to power an infernal machine because the lives of entire city are at stake and you even have a chance to redeem the ruler Avernus. So the destruction of one evil soul would shift your soul to evil but not condemn it.

But if Karlach is using these to keep on living? That's just evil. In 6 days we'll know if the youtubers who floated the soul coin theory are correct . . . (or probably 10 days because I don't expect to finish downloading before the weekend)

We just don't know Wyll's story now - I wanted to save him from his contract before. Will I still feel the same 🤷‍♂️?

Joined: Jul 2021
A
stranger
Offline
stranger
A
Joined: Jul 2021
I voted Gale, but I'm honestly a little overwhelmed by all the interesting choices for my first run. I'm probably going LG Paladin Tav, so other than the evil/unholy options (Minthara, Astarion, Lae'zel) there's a bunch of other possibilities. Could end up going with Karlach or Halsin. I look forward to spending an hour deliberating it in camp lol.

Joined: Oct 2021
Z
Jhe'stil Kith'rak
OP Offline
Jhe'stil Kith'rak
Z
Joined: Oct 2021


Remember the human (This is a forum for a video game):
Joined: Nov 2020
Location: Silverymoon
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2020
Location: Silverymoon
Originally Posted by KillerRabbit
But if Karlach is using these to keep on living? That's just evil.

Yeah, I really don't like this theory. That is not what I was hoping we could do with the soul coins (I wanted to set the souls free!).

Page 7 of 12 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 11 12

Moderated by  Dom_Larian, Freddo, vometia 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5