Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2019
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Jun 2019
Originally Posted by Xzoviac
Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
It was maybe smart move from Influencers to went silent and study the source material carefully ...
Wolfheart hinted he is working on "something important, wink wink" right now.

While Fextralife just shared a video about Origin companions subclasses, where one of his tips is that we should respec Shadowheart to different Cleric type right off the bat.
Im not really sure it will be possible tho. O_o

Its weird iv not seen any reviews yet, thought there would be a few before release

I dont mind Fex, never heard of him until PFH came out. The curious thing about this guide for me was, Correct me if Im wrong, however the way I heard it was, figure out your party, then figure out your build... and to me I always play what I want and then design my party right? anyway I MAY be thinking to hard lol

I know having a charisma character can be important, I guess Ill cross that bridge. I will not be taking Wyll, at least on this first run. I will be a duergar... as of now, will see but most defiantly a dwarf, going to go battle cleric. I may have to give him some charisma.. but damn thats going to hurt.

Last edited by Doomlord; 02/08/23 03:31 PM.

DRAGON FIRE-AND DOOM Dragons? Splendid things, lad-so long as ye look upon them only in tapestries, or in the masks worn at revels, or from about three realms off...
Astragarl Hornwood, Mage of Elembar - Year of the Tusk
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Liberec
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Liberec
Originally Posted by CerusSerenade
Yes, a movie can be fine as a turn-your-brain-off entertainment. HOWEVER, a movie can have action, stakes, and even be made for kids and STILL have a deeper message and good writing.
I never said it cant ...
I say that if its not supposed to have "a thing", it seems weird to criticize it for lacking "a thing". smile

My tea have no caffeine in it ...
Does it make it bad tea?
Not at all.
Can it still be bad tea? Sure! But hardly for this reason.

A movie have no deeper thought, nor any important message in it ...
Does it make it bad movie?
Not at all.
Can it still be bad movie? Sure! But hardly for this reason.

This video is purely focused on maximising effectivity.
Does is make it bad video?
Not at all.
I hope you get the idea. smile

Purpose corresponds with final product ...
Say whatever you want, but in my book that is a good thing. laugh

Originally Posted by CerusSerenade
I saw people defending the new Mario movie to hell and back by saying "it' a movie for kids why are you expecting good qualities out of it" to which I can now respond "Nimona, a movie released earlier this year, was ALSO made for kids and it was LEAGUES better in terms of writing and theme." That's excluding all the stuff like Gargoyles, Courage the Cowardly Dog, etc.
I didnt seen either, so i cant coment on that. smile

Still ... one of my favourite movie is French movie called RRRrrrr!!!. (I recomend.)
I would never say it was telling any important messages, or deeper thoughts ... and it was still awesome! xD

Originally Posted by CerusSerenade
The idea that you can excuse poor writing and shallow themes with "it's just x" is silly.
I dont think i can agree with this sentence ...
The main core of such principle seems wrong to me.

Bcs, first of all ... its not an excuse. smile
Not everything needs to be super deep, educational, or sending an important message about something serious ... people should remember that is fine to just throw everything (yes, brain included ... not litteraly tho) out of window and just have fun ... if for no other reason, then bcs they simply want to. laugh
And there are movies that gives them exactly that ... that is their purpose, and they serve it well enough. wink
You dont like Mario movie? That is perfectly fine and valid.
Someone else do? Also perfectly fine and valid.

Is there is anything silly, its arguing about that. laugh

Originally Posted by CerusSerenade
Just have higher standards for the million/billionaires.
Il be the judge of my own standards if you dont mind, thank you very much. wink


I still dont understand why cant we change Race for our hirelings. frown
Lets us play Githyanki as racist as they trully are! frown
Joined: Aug 2023
Z
stranger
Offline
stranger
Z
Joined: Aug 2023
Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
I dont mind Fex, never heard of him until PFH came out. The curious thing about this guide for me was, Correct me if Im wrong, however the way I heard it was, figure out your party, then figure out your build... and to me I always play what I want and then design my party right? anyway I MAY be thinking to hard lol.

He does say in there several times that "you don't have to do it this way" so it's really just one way of assembling a party. Specifically, if you care a lot about which companions you want to have with you in order to play out their parts of the story and are willing to limit your own class/role choices to achieve this.

You could also do something like go with a whacked-out fun/random class combination and just play on one tier easier difficulty say.

Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Liberec
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Liberec
Im quite sure it wasnt me, Zoot. laugh


I still dont understand why cant we change Race for our hirelings. frown
Lets us play Githyanki as racist as they trully are! frown
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Dom_Larian, Freddo, vometia 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5