So it's a basically a yes, cause your post reads like a yes, but you voted no because you interpret the poll as puritan?
Allow me to add some reasons behind the contention that BG3 might be too sexualized:
1. The PC can engage in sexual relationships with any companion regardless of sex, which means the companions are all bisexual, which breaks immersion because it doesn't nearly reflect the reality of common sexual predisposition (the fictional setting doesn't change that). 1 in 5 non-straight options should be more than sufficient to be reflective of society.
2. The PC can engage in sexual relationships with any companion regardless of race, which is odd considering I don't see Shadowheart ever romancing a gith, or Lae'zel romancing anyone -but- a gith.
3. I realize we live in a culture where people already decide to smash or pass within the first 10 seconds of meeting anyone, but we don't tend to see the actual realization of that behaviour as dignified. Which means that if every companion comes across as someone who would have a profile on Grindr, it gets pretty hard to take those companions seriously and they're the companions you have to rely on to ... whatever the ultimate objective is in this game (I haven't gone passed Act 1 yet).
Don't think any of the above points are indicative of a puritan bias.
I'll add this to the OP for the sake of elaboration.
