@fylimar, @Boblawblah, I feel you guys are being a bit too harsh in your reactions to my post, where I very clearly separated people in this forum from what I said. My frustrations are almost entirely directed at pro reviewers, who I believe are doing a grave disservice to cRPG fans by not giving them a more balanced and fair assessment of the game.
But I do acknowledge and very much appreciate that you guys, along with others like @KillerRabbit and @Zerubbabel, have always been not only fair but outright nice towards me on this forum where generally I've not had much of that. So if my post caused any kind of unhappiness in *you* guys (I don't really care about the people who've hated on me), then I offer my sincerest apologies to you for that.
Why do you think it is doing a disservice to crpg fans? Sorry for being blunt, but this doesn't make any sense. Did it occur to you that those reviewers were genuinely excited playing this game? That the score really describes what they think about the game? Do you really think all 55 reviewers were wrong? Yes, Eurogamer gave 80%, but I'm pretty sure they would give 4.5/5 (so, 90%) if they still use half point scores.
And for the record, I don't hate you, I simply don't agree with you about the quality of BG3.
