How does any of that even have any relation to the Oath of the Ancients oath? They desperately need to clearly lay out the guidelines for how they decided what these tenants are and mean. Because it's been pretty nonsensical. Oath of Vengeance paladins even get called oathbreakers for killing people who are trying to kill them, if they were marked as "innocents." And labeling someone who wants to murder a trapped Lae'zel for being gith as "innocent" to begin with is one hell of a stretch.
