Oh no, we did get, what you said, I just ignored you, because it is mysogenic, sexist and racist. And I'd rather engaged with the nicer discussions about the topic.
It is his opinion and he did not attack an individual like you did.[/quote]
fylimar did not attack him, they just stated, that what he SAID is "mysogenic, sexist and racist". That's also an opinion, and one that is hard to argue against if I'm being honest
Borys of Ebe said that there was too much representation of certain groups of people in the game and that the game would be better / more believable with less representation. Arguably that is a very strong and hurtful attack against all the people who are part of the group he thinks are deviant from what he thinks is the norm.[/quote]
Thanks, as a member of two of the three groups, OP attacked (being a woman and LGBTQ+) that post did hurt me. I didn't attack OP personally, I just attacked his opinion.
I don't get why people think to gatekeep different genres etc. If OP wants to fulfill his straight white male power fantasy (I'm assuming here of course based on what he wrote, if I'm wrong, sorry), he can make a warrior or barbar and just not use Lae'zel and Karlach and romance Shadowheart or Minthara. To basically say, that warrior women, other ethnicities and gay people shouldn't be in the game , because 'Tolkien', is de facto gatekeeping.
Everyone can play the game, as they like, there is no need to demand to take away from people, who like different things in this game, based on the fact, that 'back in the day' AD&D and whatsnot was not that divers.
