Originally Posted by Dext. Paladin
Originally Posted by Leucrotta
I never get why people have to beat on what came before to justify their liking of a sequel. It's literally a thread about remaking the game and as a counterargument directed at the folks who don't want to see a remake, we got 'the Originals were bad anyways'. Then why a remake if you dislike it so much? One would think there'd be common ground at least with the people who don't want to see Larian remake them on this one instance. Why can't we have even obliquel criticism of BG III without folks coming out of the woodwork to take the contrarian stance? The tribalism surrounding BG can be rather ridiculous at times, IMHO.

Weird because a lot of times in both Steam and Larian forum, many people have came out of the woodwork just to criticize larian, not obliquely, not even constructive criticism, just to demand arbitrary stuff or to nit-picking stuff they won't on the game they love.


BG1/2 remake will never happen. I'm pretty sure there are hundreds of cope- I mean, mourning threads like that in Beamdog forum, so anyone of you feel free to go there to discuss with their tenants. They've been mourning since 2013.
Case in point. Little bit of criticism, a hint that some might prefer the older games in one way or another, and someone's gotta take a dump on them and their fans just to validate their love of the game that just came out. I mean heck, you even dragged Beamdog into this. And there's that byword 'cope'-gotta be smug about the discomfort of others somehow, I guess. But no actual 'constructive criticism' or feedback to OP's post. Ironic, I suppose.