Originally Posted by Ixal
Originally Posted by Chiquidmaster
Originally Posted by Icelyn
Originally Posted by Dauyxe
I actually had no idea that Halsin as a romancable character wasn't an original idea but a fan request. It makes more sense to me now why people feel let down. It's uncomfortable to wish for something, then kind of get it, but with an unpopular twist. Writing Halsin as a poly seems a risque approach from that background.
Yes, originally he wasn�t going to be a companion or a romance. Then a lot of people, including me, loved his character and asked for him to be a companion and romance. But I guess I wasn�t specific enough and failed my wish spell!!!


This, for many people the genuine romantic interest in the game is Halsin. And well, it is clear that he is a character with great appeal for players (I include myself here) so I don't think the solution lies in this but rather in solving the errors. Let's see, in the game you can clearly see that act 3 was short of time, and it also advanced the exit, logically all of Halsin's romance that was included there will be with the errors that we are seeing

How were the requests worded?
"Halsin is such a gentle, mature man I want more of" or "Halsin is a big, strong honka honka, give me more of him".

Considering all the thirsting I see going on for BG3 characters I assume the latter.


I made a "short" text of mine justifying failures, indicating why it is lacking in content, explaining that the rest of the romances give you options to have a relationship that is pleasant player (Halsin is the only one that you cannot be monogamous) and Halsin No, the ending is cow poop and we need them to recycle animations to have moments of intimacy in the camp with the romances (even DAO has the option to sleep with them). I ended with: fix Halsin Larian first notice and now I use this phrase to end some of my posts