Originally Posted by Blackheifer
Originally Posted by Rahaya
You literally said you blame WOTC over Larian for BG3's Act 3.

It was pointed out to you that they did the same thing with DOS 1 and 2, so there was no reason to believe that BG3 is any different.

SNIP - Here we go, so I DIDNT say that - someone else said that - and you ploncked it onto my argument. So, basically YOU or whoever said that would need to prove that point, not me, right?
Originally Posted by Blackheifer
1) Larian had 1/4 the budget of Starfield
2) The only way you "buy" user scores is by making a game people like. Bg3 had Excellent User and Official review scores. Starfield has ok review Scores and REALLY bad User scores.

I can't defend the unfinished state of Act 3 - but I also think you are reacting to incomplete information and you are misdirecting your anger. I think, given what I have seen and know, that Larian chose the best of a series of bad options. You want to think about the relationships that Larian has and how that affects decisions they had to make.

So not to put too fine a point on it, I don't blame Larian, I blame WOTC/Hasbro.

Tell me again what you did not say.

I'll wait.

Quote
Originally Posted by Rahaya
To wit:

I am aware of what your Hasbro theory is. It fails on the account of one simple fact: Hasbro/WOTC did not fund the development of BG3. It does not matter who is the CEO or what their fiscal year looks like, because they are not on the hook financially for the game that would give them any kind of leverage over when it is released. Larian is.

You are WAY off. Wow, is that what you had been thinking? How did you even get there?!

Look, and I mean this sincerely, you don't understand ANYTHING, and I think it's beyond any human that exists skills to explain it to you. Just stop.

Originally Posted by Blackheifer
And it's unfortunate, because objective responses are valuable, it allows you to focus on the issue. When the issue is "everything", also vague and "despite the evidence to the contrary" then those responses have no value.
You were talking about criticisms of the game.

At which point I asked you for this evidence as we were just talking about criticisms of the game. And I asked to find out what criticisms you were responding to had 'evidence to the contrary.'

You responded with Hasbro's CEO and fiscal year.

My guy, you don't get to talk about people not understanding things.