Originally Posted by Blackheifer
Originally Posted by Rahaya
Tell me again what you did not say.

I'll wait.

Happy to. I never said anything about DOS1 or DOS2 in any statement I made about WOTC. So I don't have to address that.

I never said anything about DOS1 or DOS2 in any statement I made about WOTC. So I don't have to address that.


I never said anything about DOS1 or DOS2 in any statement I made about WOTC. So I don't have to address that.


I never said anything about DOS1 or DOS2 in any statement I made about WOTC. So I don't have to address that.

Keep reading them, eventually one will sink in.



Originally Posted by Rahaya
You were talking about criticisms of the game.

At which point I asked you for this evidence as we were just talking about criticisms of the game. And I asked to find out what criticisms you were responding to had 'evidence to the contrary.'

You responded with Hasbro's CEO and fiscal year.

My guy, you don't get to talk about people not understanding things.

Lets try an experiment. And this is crazy and I am 100% sure this won't work as I fervently understand that you are IMPERVIOUS to information - a super power no one would ever want.

Lets try you answering the two questions I gave you:

1. How long has Chris Cocks been CEO of Hasbro?
2. What is Hasbro's FISCAL year start/end?


Just humor me.
No, if you are going to resort to insults, it is time you humor me.

Originally Posted by Blackheifer
Originally Posted by Rahaya
You literally said you blame WOTC over Larian for BG3's Act 3.

It was pointed out to you that they did the same thing with DOS 1 and 2, so there was no reason to believe that BG3 is any different.

SNIP - Here we go, so I DIDNT say that - someone else said that - and you ploncked it onto my argument. So, basically YOU or whoever said that would need to prove that point, not me, right?
What about this exchange says you said ANYTHING about DOS 1 or 2?