I don't think it was the slightest bit unintentional. Of course I could be wrong, and I hope I am because that means a better chance of changes, but I think he really was intended to be a high libido, too kinky to torture, free loving to the extreme, stereotype of the way many gamers approach sex in games. Possibly because the writer(s) thought he'd be too boring otherwise? I dunno. I think there's also a serious and good faith attempt at poly representation here, which is certainly a rare thing. And maybe it's all gone exactly the way the writer(s) intended; they must have anticipated some outcry, but who knows if it's been enough or of the right type to bother them in the slightest.