Originally Posted by Kr0w93
Originally Posted by JandK
Originally Posted by birdie65775
I get it now -- Gale is a writer's joke. He is a way to blow up the entire story before it lapses into incoherence.

I think what you're saying is that Act III is so bad that the writers put Gale in as a way to end the story after Act II. Because the writers didn't feel like Act III was ready for release? So it was their way of ending their story while the story was still good?
Speak for yourself, I enjoyed Act 3 from a story standpoint *shrug*

I DO wish it was more functional.

lol, I'm not speaking for me there. I was just trying to understand what was being said in the original post. That was me trying to rephrase what was being said so that I could see if I interpreted the initial post correctly.